PROBLEMS OF DIGITIZATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEADING SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES: THE EXPERIENCE OF POLAND AND UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2410-2075-2025-21.7Keywords:
digitization, scientific approaches, ICT competencies, hybrid learning, infrastructure, LMSAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to conduct a theoretical and comparative analysis of the digitalization of the educational process in Poland and Ukraine during 2012–2022, specifically to identify the features of ICT competence development, infrastructure advancement, and the implementation of hybrid learning in general and higher education institutions within the context of relevant scholarly approaches. Methods. A systematic review of professional literature and an analysis of national digitalization strategies (“Cyfrowa szkoła,” ZPE, DigCompEdu, “Diia.Osvita,” “Digital Agenda”) were conducted based on criteria for comparing infrastructural indicators (internet coverage speed, number of computers per school, availability of mobile IT kits) and the level of certification of teachers and learners (DigCompEdu, ECDL, “Cyfrohram”). Results. The study examined findings from national assessments (PISA Digital) and reports of the Ministries of Education of Ukraine and Poland. It was found that Poland employs a centralized digitalization model with clearly defined ICT competence standards and a mandatory teacher certification system; in Ukraine, initiatives are crisis-driven and rely on donor programs. However, the “Diia.Osvita” initiative enabled the training of more than 100,000 teachers, and 85% of educational institutions now have access to LMS platforms. Both countries demonstrate a high level of basic digital literacy among secondary and higher education learners (PISA Digital: +8% above the European average), although disparities in internet coverage remain (up to 15% of schools in Ukraine), along with the absence of unified methodological guidelines for organizing blended learning environments. Originality. The scientific novelty of the comparative study lies in identifying the principal achievements and challenges of integrating ICT into educational practices in Ukraine and Poland, as well as outlining the key issues related to the digital competence of teachers and learners and possible strategies to address them. Conclusion. It is proposed to develop national digital competence standards for all levels of education, standardize certification models for teachers and learners, implement centralized methodological platforms with ready-made scenarios for hybrid courses, and ensure systematic monitoring of IT infrastructure.
References
Вербовський І. А., Чипорнюк В. В. Теоретичні аспекти управління якістю освіти у закладах вищої освіти. Адаптивне управління: теорія і практика. Серія «Педагогіка». 2024. Вип. 19 (37). С. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0654-19(38)-24
Вербовський І. А. Ефективність цифровізації в управлінні освітніми ресурсами: аналіз та стратегії оптимізації. Академічні візії. 2024. Вип. 27. С. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10471716
Цифрова адженда України – 2020 («Цифровий порядок денний» – 2020): проєкт. Концептуальні засади. 2016. URL: https://ucci.org.ua/uploads/files/58e78ee3c3922.pdf (дата звернення: 25.05.2025).
Bakhov I., Opolska N., Bogus M., Anishchenko V., Biryukova Y. Emergency distance education in the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic: Experience of Ukrainian universities. Education Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. № 7. Р. 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070364.
Górski M., Wójcik Z. Digital transformation in secondary school education in Poland: Initiatives and outcomes. Education Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020045.
Kovalchuk I., Yaremchuk I. Digital transformation of university education in Ukraine: Trajectories of development in the conditions of new technological and economic order. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2023. Vol. 21. № 4. P. 112–124. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.09.
Krymska A., Chalii A., Petruk V., Kobzieva O., Tytar O. Challenges and opportunities of digital transformation in Ukrainian education. Futurity Education. 2024. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 182–199. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2024.09.25.11.
Ministerstwo Edukacji Narodowej. Program Cyfrowa szkoła. 2012. URL: https://www.gov.pl/web/edukacja/cyfrowa-szkola (date of access: 25.05.2025).
Parlińska M. Challenges in implementing e-learning in Polish higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies. 2022. Vol. 27. № 3. P. 2955–2972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10738-1.
Smirnova I., Pavlenko T. Ukrainian e-learning platforms for schools: Evaluation of their functionality. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2022. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 123–145. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i3.5769.
Stecuła K., Wolniak R. Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Dissemination of Innovative E-Learning Tools in Higher Education in Poland. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022. Vol. 8. № 2. Art. 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020089.
Ustawa z dnia 14 grudnia 2016 r. prawo oświatowe. Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2017. poz. 59. URL: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20170000059isap.sejm.gov.pl (date of access: 25.05.2025).
Wilczewski M., Gorbaniuk O., Mughan T., Wilczewska E. The effects of online learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic on students’ satisfaction, adjustment, performance, and loyalty: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Interactive Systems. 2020. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12i3.3930.
Yongjun Z., Anishchenko V. O., Vasylenko O. V., Iaremenko N. V., Fomin M. V. Leadership development in students as part of attitude development. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies. 2021. Vol. 15. P. 202–214. https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2021.15.21.





